http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18747
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18747
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2012-08-31
21:35:38 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Aug 31 21:35:33 2012
New Revision: 190842
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190842
Log:
PR c++/18747
* pt.c (check_template_variabl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18747
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
--- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-30 12:41
---
*** Bug 41875 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from sambitdash at gmail dot com 2006-06-05 13:46 ---
>From the C++ standard draft specification
An explicit specialization of any of the following:
function template
class template
member function of a class template
static data member of a class template
membe
--- Comment #2 from sambitdash at gmail dot com 2006-06-05 06:29 ---
So is:
struct A
{
};
template<> A i;
which means the specilization syntax does not mandate a need the qualifying
class needs to be a template type. That looks interesting!!!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-01
03:01 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
