https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118626
--- Comment #9 from Patrick Palka ---
A valid reduced testcase:
template struct _Nth_type;
template
struct variant {
template static constexpr long __accepted_index = 0;
template using __to_type = _Nth_type<_Np>;
template using __accepte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118626
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118626
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60254
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60254&action=edit
Reduced testcase
Note this reduced testcase is invalid in this case. I didn't try to reduce it
to a valid case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118626
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118626
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|needs-source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118626
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118626
--- Comment #3 from Jan Papesch ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Can you provide the source you are compiling. Preprocessed would be best.
> You might need to compress it if it is too large.
I'm sorry, I thought I attached it w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118626
--- Comment #2 from Jan Papesch ---
Created attachment 60248
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60248&action=edit
Zipped preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118626
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
