[Bug c++/117751] [15 regression] 18_support/50594.cc fails since r15-5595-g27778979c9a1e3 with -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

2024-11-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117751 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug c++/117751] [15 regression] 18_support/50594.cc fails since r15-5595-g27778979c9a1e3 with -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

2024-11-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117751 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- I agree, adding the new option to this test makes perfect sense. I'll check for other tests where we do this kind of thing.

[Bug c++/117751] [15 regression] 18_support/50594.cc fails since r15-5595-g27778979c9a1e3 with -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

2024-11-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117751 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #59681|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/117751] [15 regression] 18_support/50594.cc fails since r15-5595-g27778979c9a1e3 with -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

2024-11-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117751 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug c++/117751] [15 regression] 18_support/50594.cc fails since r15-5595-g27778979c9a1e3 with -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

2024-11-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117751 --- Comment #6 from Sam James --- Created attachment 59681 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59681&action=edit reduced.ii Attached an attempted reduction but I don't think it's very useful. It clearly relies on a side-effect

[Bug c++/117751] [15 regression] 18_support/50594.cc fails

2024-11-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117751 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. t__pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=, signo=6, no_tid=0) at pthread_kill.c:44 44return INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERROR_P (ret) ? INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERRNO (ret) : 0

[Bug c++/117751] [15 regression] 18_support/50594.cc fails since r15-5595-g27778979c9a1e3

2024-11-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117751 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[15 regression] |[15 regression] |18_suppo

[Bug c++/117751] [15 regression] 18_support/50594.cc fails since r15-5595-g27778979c9a1e3 with -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

2024-11-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117751 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- Created attachment 59680 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59680&action=edit a-50594.ii.xz

[Bug c++/117751] [15 regression] 18_support/50594.cc fails since r15-5595-g27778979c9a1e3

2024-11-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117751 --- Comment #4 from Sam James --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #3) > Just -O1 -fwhole-program is enough, obviously. > > What I'm wondering is what's special here. Jakub is very thorough so either > missed it or something else is happenin

[Bug c++/117751] [15 regression] 18_support/50594.cc fails since r15-5595-g27778979c9a1e3

2024-11-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117751 --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- Just -O1 -fwhole-program is enough, obviously. What I'm wondering is what's special here. Jakub is very thorough so either missed it or something else is happening.