https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116682
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59107|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116682
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59107
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59107&action=edit
Mostly reduced
This is as far as I got. No more includes and less 40 lines.
And yes I think it is valid (had t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116682
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116682
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-reduction
--- Comment #4 from And
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116682
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reducing this ...
Note what was provided was basically an unincluded version which just happens
to be ok in this case but not always. Next time please provide the full
preprocessed source and you can compre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116682
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59097
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59097&action=edit
Compressed testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116682
Huw Rogers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Build|
