https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116673
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116673
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116673
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9fe57e4879de93b6e3c7b4c226f42d5f3a48474f
commit r15-3614-g9fe57e4879de93b6e3c7b4c226f42d5f3a48474f
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116673
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116673
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> I don't remember why I did it that way rather than with static_assert in the
> body of std::launder. I must hate fast compilations.
Oh, because doesn't inc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116673
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Something like this:
--- a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
@@ -13396,11 +13396,20 @@ finish_builtin_launder (location_t loc, tree arg,
tsubst_flags_t complain)
arg = decay_conversion (a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116673
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't remember why I did it that way rather than with static_assert in the
body of std::launder. I must hate fast compilations.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116673
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
