[Bug c++/115728] Feature Request: inline assembly improvements for C++

2024-07-01 Thread eric-bugs at omnifarious dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115728 --- Comment #4 from eric-bugs at omnifarious dot org --- (In reply to ak from comment #3) > The constexpr asm support is in trunk. It supports templates. > > > >The second is I want finer grain control over marking memory regions as > >needing

[Bug c++/115728] Feature Request: inline assembly improvements for C++

2024-07-01 Thread ak at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115728 ak at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug c++/115728] Feature Request: inline assembly improvements for C++

2024-07-01 Thread eric-bugs at omnifarious dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115728 --- Comment #2 from eric-bugs at omnifarious dot org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > I think there's (pending?) support to allow the asm text to be generated by > constexpr evaluation. Not sure if that will help. I would have

[Bug c++/115728] Feature Request: inline assembly improvements for C++

2024-07-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115728 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Version|unknown