https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114488
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> On the gcc-9 branch the first bad commit is r9-8623-g0296697cf9893d
Which was the backport of r11-122.
And as expected, the ICE began on gcc-10 with the gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114488
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
On the gcc-9 branch the first bad commit is r9-8623-g0296697cf9893d
commit 0296697cf9893dc9509cdcd8e3fd4ba9fe422527
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mon May 25 18:38:09 2020 -0400
c++: constexpr and lam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114488
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
An ICE seems to have started on trunk with r11-122 and been fixed by r11-557
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114488
--- Comment #2 from mauro russo ---
If something is removed from sample code (e.g., b made bool instead of a
shared_ptr, or some const is removed), the problem disappears.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114488
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
See Also|
