https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111608
mauro russo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ing.russomauro at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111608
--- Comment #4 from Julien Bernard ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
I wasn't sure how to describe this issue, so my last sentence was probably
incorrect.
> I suspect this is covered by [temp.point] p7:
>
> "If two different p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111608
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Julien Bernard from comment #0)
> which seems incorrect since their have different levels of specialization.
But they're not the same thing. The first one is a specialization of the member
fu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111608
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
EDG rejects this too:
"spec.cc", line 13: error: this partial specialization would have been used to
instantiate class "X"
struct X {
^
1 error detected in the compilation of "spec.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111608
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.2.0, 14.0, 7.5.0
Keywords
