[Bug c++/111069] Mangling of static structured bindings

2023-09-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111069 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd37325b8d500bf4021692620686572d5ffb0868 commit r14-3624-gcd37325b8d500bf4021692620686572d5ffb0868 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: F

[Bug c++/111069] Mangling of static structured bindings

2023-08-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111069 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #55763|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/111069] Mangling of static structured bindings

2023-08-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111069 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 55763 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55763&action=edit gcc14-pr111069-wip.patch WIP patch. Seems to get the basics right, but mangling of guard vars (_ZGV*) and lif

[Bug c++/111069] Mangling of static structured bindings

2023-08-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111069 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug c++/111069] Mangling of static structured bindings

2023-08-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111069 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Yes, though this PR has more info. grep 1[ik]1[jl] pr111069-2.s | grep : _ZZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE: _ZGVZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE: _ZZ6freddyvEDC1k1lE: _ZGVZ6freddyvEDC1k1lE: _ZZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE_0: _ZGVZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE_

[Bug c++/111069] Mangling of static structured bindings

2023-08-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111069 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/111069] Mangling of static structured bindings

2023-08-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111069 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Apparently my fault as I've done r10-720-gb7f0df71a9de2354fcb7 which enabled it, but am not really sure what is the correct mangling.