https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #14 from Xi Ruoyao ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Attributes cannot be|Attributes cannot be
|app
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
--- Comment #7 from Julian Waters ---
I have a new attribute proposed for asm declarations that fixes this issue, but
I need help from reviews to proceed with fixing up the patch properly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
Julian Waters changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tanksherman27 at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
--- Comment #5 from Julian Waters ---
Note: Trying this with a top level asm gives me:
$ g++ -O3 -flto=auto -std=c++14 -pedantic -Wpedantic -fno-omit-frame-pointer
exceptions.cpp
exceptions.cpp:8:1: error: expected unqualified-id before 'asm'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
--- Comment #4 from Julian Waters ---
My mistake, I forgot to mention that it was indeed inside a function body. I
can't seem to figure out what in parser.cc is causing this bug, anything on
your end?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
--- Comment #2 from Julian Waters ---
Is this accurately described as an enhancement? This is erroneous behaviour
with something that is already meant to be a feature in gcc (applying
attributes to statements, as seen inside parser.cc), not a fe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
Julian Waters changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |13.1.1
--- Comment #1 from Julian Water
10 matches
Mail list logo
