https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106784
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106784
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:be4b32b9ef69b86b662cb7511b48cd1048a55403
commit r13-2879-gbe4b32b9ef69b86b662cb7511b48cd1048a55403
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106784
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106784
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106784
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a7bcf95a82c3dd68bd4bcfbd8432eb970575bc2
commit r13-2822-g8a7bcf95a82c3dd68bd4bcfbd8432eb970575bc2
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106784
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We can certainly change the struct name.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106784
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
FWIW, I notice that include/std/type_traits implements struct
__is_nothrow_convertible so I think its name has to change, otherwise it would
clash with this new built-in.
Though, it seems that clang doesn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106784
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
To be clear, I'd like __is_nothrow_convertible too. But if I only get
__is_convertible first, that would still be great.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106784
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106784
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
10 matches
Mail list logo
