https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104025
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104025
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2aa184458a11a7ec8c1b451b8eeff458a24632bb
commit r12-6703-g2aa184458a11a7ec8c1b451b8eeff458a24632bb
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104025
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Maybe. But how? Would it push a pair of next_token, input_location ?
I think it isn't easy to recompute input_location after the rollback otherwise.
And, I'm a little bit worried that such a change could b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104025
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Created attachment 52213 [details]
> gcc12-pr104025.patch
>
> Untested fix. I think the old input_location is the right one.
I think the bug is that cp_lexer_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104025
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104025
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104025
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104025
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Obviously removing "&& warn_missing_template_keyword" will fix the
fcompare-debug but the question is which location is the more correct one?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104025
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-01-14
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104025
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|debug |c++
Target Milestone|---
10 matches
Mail list logo
