[Bug c++/101480] [11 Regression] Miscompiled code involving operator new

2024-11-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101480 --- Comment #27 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:27778979c9a1e32a6ca74e5b5f377385225449b1 commit r15-5595-g27778979c9a1e32a6ca74e5b5f377385225449b1 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug c++/101480] [11 Regression] Miscompiled code involving operator new

2021-11-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101480 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.2.1 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/101480] [11 Regression] Miscompiled code involving operator new

2021-11-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101480 --- Comment #25 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19dcea67ac40cfdeb396fa264ebbe04fbe61fdc0 commit r11-9222-g19dcea67ac40cfdeb396fa264ebbe04fbe61fdc0 Author: Richard Biene

[Bug c++/101480] [11 Regression] Miscompiled code involving operator new

2021-10-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101480 --- Comment #24 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #23) > The first thing a delete expression does is invoke the destructor, after > that there is no object anyway. The situation where we avoid the escape only is

[Bug c++/101480] [11 Regression] Miscompiled code involving operator new

2021-10-12 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101480 --- Comment #23 from Jonathan Wakely --- The first thing a delete expression does is invoke the destructor, after that there is no object anyway.

[Bug c++/101480] [11 Regression] Miscompiled code involving operator new

2021-10-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101480 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|11.1.0 | --- Comment #22 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/101480] [11 Regression] Miscompiled code involving operator new

2021-10-11 Thread hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101480 --- Comment #21 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz --- Hi, note that also tree-ssa-structalias has: /* If the call is to a replaceable operator delete and results from a delete expression as opposed to a direct call to

[Bug c++/101480] [11 Regression] Miscompiled code involving operator new

2021-10-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101480 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|12.0|11.2.0 Known to work|