[Bug bootstrap/97124] ICE when bootstrapping GCC on x86_64-w64-mingw32

2020-10-26 Thread lh_mouse at 126 dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97124 Liu Hao changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/97124] ICE when bootstrapping GCC on x86_64-w64-mingw32

2020-10-25 Thread lh_mouse at 126 dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97124 --- Comment #6 from Liu Hao --- Today I got the same ICE when building mingw-w64. I am not clear why this error only happened with GCC previously.

[Bug bootstrap/97124] ICE when bootstrapping GCC on x86_64-w64-mingw32

2020-09-21 Thread lh_mouse at 126 dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97124 --- Comment #5 from Liu Hao --- I didn't keep a copy of the file. It was stage1 xgcc that ICEs, not the host gcc.

[Bug bootstrap/97124] ICE when bootstrapping GCC on x86_64-w64-mingw32

2020-09-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97124 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Of course not, I don't have any libraries/headers for that. What I meant is if you upload preprocessed source, one might try to reproduce it with a cross that doesn't have anything (binutils, libraries, heade

[Bug bootstrap/97124] ICE when bootstrapping GCC on x86_64-w64-mingw32

2020-09-21 Thread lh_mouse at 126 dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97124 --- Comment #3 from Liu Hao --- Did you reproduce the ICE when cross-compiling? I suspect no, as the MSYS2 patch contains some twiddling about stack limits and forces static linking of libgcc during bootstrapping, which should not affect cross-c

[Bug bootstrap/97124] ICE when bootstrapping GCC on x86_64-w64-mingw32

2020-09-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97124 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug bootstrap/97124] ICE when bootstrapping GCC on x86_64-w64-mingw32

2020-09-20 Thread lh_mouse at 126 dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97124 --- Comment #1 from Liu Hao --- MSYS2 has this patch [1]. Should it be incorporated by GCC somehow? [1] https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/commit/0b2f1460ea3b72aa6cf4f263ace52f61a3470afe