https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #24 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
Confirmed for i386-unknown-freebsd10.3 (using clang as bootstrap
compiler) as well.
Thank you, Richard!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #23 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #22 from Richard Biener ---
> Fixed.
Indeed: I've just successfully completed a i386-pc-solaris2.11 bootstrap
without the workaround (preloaded libumem.so), and a
sparc-s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 87271 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 13 11:31:58 2018
New Revision: 264268
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264268&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-09-13 Richard Biener
PR bootstrap/87134
* tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #18 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou ---
>> > On SPARC/Solaris?
>>
>> Yes please, on an arbitrary input you see the segbus/segfault.
>
> It was a rhetorical question, there is no valgr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou ---
> > On SPARC/Solaris?
>
> Yes please, on an arbitrary input you see the segbus/segfault.
It was a rhetorical question, there is no valgrind on this platform... But
I'll debug the issue at some point, no w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #15)
> > Could you please run compiler in valgrind?
>
> On SPARC/Solaris?
Yes please, on an arbitrary input you see the segbus/segfault.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Could you please run compiler in valgrind?
On SPARC/Solaris?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #13)
> I have random SIGBUS errors on SPARC/Solaris 10 and 11 machines.
Could you please run compiler in valgrind?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
> So I've applied a patch that might fix the originally reported segfault.
It doesn't help unfortunately: I'm still seeing SEGVs on both
i386-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
So I've applied a patch that might fix the originally reported segfault.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Sep 5 11:44:13 2018
New Revision: 264125
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264125&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-09-05 Richard Biener
PR bootstrap/87134
* tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE > Hmm, GCC 7.1.0 of course makes me raise eyebrows. Do you by chance
>> have another host compiler to cross-test whether it's a h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
[...]
>> > What's your host compiler? Do you use custom STAGE1_CFLAGS?
>>
>> Just a vanilla i386-pc-solaris2.11 gcc 7.1.0. Nothing s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 31 Aug 2018, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
>
> --- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
[...]
> I wonder if you can run the testsuite in the not bootstrapped tree
> and look for sth suspicious.
I did that now (c and c++ on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 30 Aug 2018, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
>
> --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
> You also might want to test the patch from PR87132.
I had it in my tree already last night. I've now retried the exact same
tree without libu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
You also might want to test the patch from PR87132.
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
> If you disable bootstrap does it work? The backtr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
You also might want to test the patch from PR87132.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
If you disable bootstrap does it work? The backtrace makes it look like memory
corruption. Maybe you can also throw valgrind on it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
25 matches
Mail list logo
