[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on Darwin: config/darwin.c:3665:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]

2014-01-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on Darwin: config/darwin.c:3665:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]

2014-01-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de ---

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on Darwin: config/darwin.c:3665:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]

2014-01-05 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 --- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Sun Jan 5 21:47:43 2014 New Revision: 206348 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206348&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc: PR bootstrap/59541 * config/darwin.c (darwin_function_section):

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on darwin

2014-01-04 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on darwin

2013-12-20 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Hello, > thank you for the hotfix that repaired switch/case missing return value. Nothing has been committed yet to fix darwin bootstrap!-(

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on darwin

2013-12-20 Thread marxin.liska at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- Hello, thank you for the hotfix that repaired switch/case missing return value. Actually I was told by Jan to reproduce the functionality from varasm.c that I was able to bootstrap and test. The idea of re

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on darwin

2013-12-20 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > could someone please point me at the original post for this patch? > > I have the same question. I have finally found the answer: final patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-12/msg01368.

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on darwin

2013-12-20 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Note that on x86_64-apple-darwin10 the test gcc.dg/tree-prof/cold_partition_label.c has started to fail (compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE) between r204856 (OK) and r205324 (fail). This is fixe

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on darwin

2013-12-19 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jh at suse dot cz,

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on darwin

2013-12-19 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The failure of FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1.c is due to the first part of http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/gcc/config/darwin.c?r1=206070&r2=206069&pathrev=206070&sortby=date&view=p

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on darwin

2013-12-19 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on darwin

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on darwin

2013-12-18 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The new failing tests are still there. I was wrong: gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1.c passes.

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on darwin

2013-12-18 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I have reverted the changes in gcc/config/darwin.c done by r 206070 and bootstrap went fine. The new failing tests are still there.

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on darwin

2013-12-18 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Comparing the test suite results between r206040 and r206072+my_fix, the test gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr52027.c (see pr52794) passes now, but the tests g++.dg/tree-prof/partition1.C gcc.dg/tree-prof/20041218-