http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59235
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59235
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
> Ranier,
>
> The only sparc box in the farm is the painfully slow gcc54 which someone else
> is hammering so bad there's no way I can reasonably
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59235
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59235
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59235
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59235
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Ranier,
The only sparc box in the farm is the painfully slow gcc54 which someone else
is hammering so bad there's no way I can reasonably test if the fix for 59221
also fixes this bug.
Can you update your l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59235
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Probably the same dumb oversight that's causing 59221. I will, of course,
verify that and take appropriate action. It's things like this that sometimes
makes me question bootstrapping and regression testing'
