http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-07 15:40:16
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> It's a global, why should it get collected?
Because it is empty when ggc_collect is called.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener 2013-01-07
10:12:53 UTC ---
It's a global, why should it get collected?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-05 16:47:08
UTC ---
The page is freed since there is nothing in it:
#0 set_page_table_entry (p=0x71ab8000, entry=0x0)
at /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/ggc-page.c:640
#1 0x00544514 i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-04 23:57:55
UTC ---
Created attachment 29085
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29085
A patch to move lto_global_var_decls to lto/lto.c
With this patch, I got
lto1: internal compil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-03 19:03:25
UTC ---
I got
==23584== ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address
0x7f03d1089238 at pc 0xb9284a bp 0x7fffbd507b60 sp 0x7fffbd507b58
READ of size 1 at 0x7f03d1089238 thread T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-22 20:12:50
UTC ---
ASAN:SIGSEGV
=
==19402== ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x0008 (pc
0x0067ce31 sp 0x7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
