[Bug bootstrap/53266] Error: Unrecognized opcode: `mulhwu'

2021-07-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/53266] Error: Unrecognized opcode: `mulhwu'

2012-09-27 Thread skunk at iskunk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266 --- Comment #10 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-09-27 14:02:03 UTC --- Okay, I grabbed a copy of gcc-4.8-20120923, and started bootstrapping using an older 4.5.2 (since the 4.7.0 C++ compiler isn't working correctly; am I correct in observing

[Bug bootstrap/53266] Error: Unrecognized opcode: `mulhwu'

2012-09-25 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool 2012-09-26 06:43:41 UTC --- Yes, mainline is SVN trunk. There are weekly snapshots on http://gcc.gnu.org/snapshots.html (just get the newest one, it should be more than new enough for this).

[Bug bootstrap/53266] Error: Unrecognized opcode: `mulhwu'

2012-09-25 Thread skunk at iskunk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266 --- Comment #8 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-09-26 06:06:11 UTC --- Sure, can do. Is mainline a synonym for SVN trunk? Is there somewhere I can download a ready-made tarball, just to make sure everything is autogen'ed correctly?

[Bug bootstrap/53266] Error: Unrecognized opcode: `mulhwu'

2012-09-25 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266 --- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool 2012-09-26 05:49:09 UTC --- Sorry, I didn't notice this was for 4.7 -- the removal of all suport for the POWER ISA is only on mainline, and won't be backported. Could you test mainline instead? All

[Bug bootstrap/53266] Error: Unrecognized opcode: `mulhwu'

2012-09-25 Thread skunk at iskunk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-09-25 21:38:32 UTC --- Okay, I'm bootstrapping an unmodified 4.7.2, using a previously-built 4.7.0 as CC and the following configuration options: --prefix=/opt/tg --disable-dependency-t

[Bug bootstrap/53266] Error: Unrecognized opcode: `mulhwu'

2012-09-25 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool 2012-09-25 11:44:42 UTC --- > I haven't built GCC on the AIX 4.3 (PowerPC 604) system lately, but my scripts > are set up to do so using > > --with-cpu=powerpc --disable-aix64 --disable-powercpu

[Bug bootstrap/53266] Error: Unrecognized opcode: `mulhwu'

2012-09-25 Thread skunk at iskunk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-09-25 10:56:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Does this still fail? I haven't built GCC on the AIX 4.3 (PowerPC 604) system lately, but my scripts are set up to do so using --with-cp

[Bug bootstrap/53266] Error: Unrecognized opcode: `mulhwu'

2012-09-25 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/53266] Error: Unrecognized opcode: `mulhwu'

2012-05-07 Thread skunk at iskunk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-05-07 17:42:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > mulhwu is a powerpc but not rs6000 instruction. When a file failed to compile, I noticed that specifying -mcpu=powerpc got things going again. I'm not c

[Bug bootstrap/53266] Error: Unrecognized opcode: `mulhwu'

2012-05-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-07 17:27:53 UTC --- mulhwu is a powerpc but not rs6000 instruction.