[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-07 Thread gfunck at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #47 from gfunck at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-08 02:39:06 UTC --- Author: gfunck Date: Fri Apr 8 02:38:59 2011 New Revision: 172160 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172160 Log: 2011-04-07 Gary Funck Merge tru

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-05 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-05 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #45 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-05 22:19:21 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Tue Apr 5 22:19:17 2011 New Revision: 172006 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172006 Log: PR bootstrap/48403 * haifa-sched.c (sched

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-05 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #44 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-04-05 15:45:20 UTC --- Just a note for those experiencing a comparison failure with --disable-checking, I know what's causing it and should have a fix shortly. That failure is being tracked by PR48444.

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-05 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #43 from Eric Botcazou 2011-04-05 09:02:56 UTC --- > mips64-linux, right? No, IA-64/Linux, I was replying to Steve, but this is indeed not very clear.

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #42 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-05 00:42:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #41) > I can confirm that r171959 with --enable-checking bootstraps on > f14/x86_64/linux, which was not previously the case. Thanks Bernd! I can also > assert that it

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-04 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #41 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-04-05 00:36:50 UTC --- I can confirm that r171959 with --enable-checking bootstraps on f14/x86_64/linux, which was not previously the case. Thanks Bernd! I can also assert that it still fails with --disa

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #40 from Andrew Pinski 2011-04-04 22:36:56 UTC --- Created attachment 23873 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23873 Testcase for the MIPS ICE ./cc1 t1.c -mabi=32 -O2 -march=octeon -da -quiet t1.c: In function ‘__udi

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-04 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #39 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-04 22:27:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #37) > Confirmed. Reduced testcase for -O2: > > typedef __builtin_va_list va_list; > > extern void exit (unsigned); > extern int vfprintf (void *s, const char

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-04 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #38 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-04-04 21:37:21 UTC --- YES, please revert whatever is causing this ASAP. Bootstrap has been broken for much too long, on all the common devel arches.

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-04 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #37 from Eric Botcazou 2011-04-04 21:13:51 UTC --- > /proj/opensrc/nightly/src/trunk/gcc/errors.c:86:1: internal compiler error: in > max_issue, at haifa-sched.c:2524 > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if ap

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #36 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-04 19:57:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #34) > Perhaps the patches can be reverted until it's clear what is wrong here? The > trunk is now broken for 3 days, it will make things like bisecting regressions > m

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #35 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-04 19:56:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #31) > (In reply to comment #29) > > f14 x86_64, no ppl > > Configured like so: > > /mnt/share/src/gcc.svn-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --verbose > > --pref

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-04 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #34 from Steven Bosscher 2011-04-04 19:53:52 UTC --- Perhaps the patches can be reverted until it's clear what is wrong here? The trunk is now broken for 3 days, it will make things like bisecting regressions much harder later on if i

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #33 from Andrew Pinski 2011-04-04 19:50:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #32) > > /proj/opensrc/nightly/src/trunk/gcc/errors.c:86:1: internal compiler error: in > max_issue, at haifa-sched.c:2524 > Please submit a full bug report, > w

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-04 Thread sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sje at cup dot hp.com --- Comment #32 from

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #31 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-04 19:41:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #29) > f14 x86_64, no ppl > Configured like so: > /mnt/share/src/gcc.svn-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --verbose > --prefix=/mnt/share/bin/H-x86_64-gcc-trunk

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #30 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-04 18:52:13 UTC --- This --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --enable-shared --with-demangler-in-ld --enable-cloog-backend=isl --with-ppl-include=/opt/gnu/include --with-ppl-lib=/opt/gnu/lib64 --with-clo

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-04 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #29 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-04-04 18:47:44 UTC --- f14 x86_64, no ppl %rpm -qa | grep mpfr mpfr-devel-2.4.2-1.fc13.x86_64 mpfr-2.4.2-1.fc13.x86_64 /mnt/share/bld/gcc-trunk %rpm -qa | grep

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #28 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-04 18:25:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #27) > still fails bootstrap after #26 > > make[3]: Leaving directory `/mnt/share/bld/gcc-trunk' What is your target? It works for me on Linux/ia32 and Linux/x86-64.

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-04 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 Benjamin Kosnik changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #27

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-04 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #26 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-04 16:53:57 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Apr 4 16:53:51 2011 New Revision: 171942 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171942 Log: Fix PR bootstrap/48403. 2011-04-04 Bernd

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-04 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-03 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #24 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-04-04 06:30:12 UTC --- Bootstrap comparison failure! gcc/c-family/c-ada-spec.o differs gcc/c-family/c-format.o differs gcc/c-parser.o differs gcc/cfgexpand.o differs gcc/cp/parser.o differs gcc/cse.o

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-03 Thread revital.eres at linaro dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #23 from revital.eres at linaro dot org 2011-04-03 18:01:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #0) > > On Linux/x86, revision 171845 failed to bootstrap: > There is bootsrap failure also on powerpc64-suse-linux usi

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-03 Thread revital.eres at linaro dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 revital.eres at linaro dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||revital.eres at linaro dot

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-02 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #21 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-03 00:10:06 UTC --- Okay, the problem showed up on Fedora 14 (no idea why only there). The bug is that I've missed some uses of last_scheduled_insn. Will probably be able to post a fix on Monday.

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-02 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #20 from Steven Bosscher 2011-04-02 19:55:07 UTC --- Doesn't fix the comparison failure.

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-02 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #19 from Steven Bosscher 2011-04-02 19:37:03 UTC --- Created attachment 23856 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23856 Attempt at correcting memory management for scheduled_insns Currently trying to see if this boots

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-02 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #18 from Steven Bosscher 2011-04-02 19:16:17 UTC --- Something appears to be wrong with the allocation of scheduled_insns: * It is VEC_alloc'ed on the heap in sched_extend_ready_list() but it is never VEC_free'ed. * It is allocated

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-02 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #17 from Steven Bosscher 2011-04-02 15:08:33 UTC --- FWIW: 171842 is OK, 171843 gives the comparison failure. No surprise, I suppose, but for the record...

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-02 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.0 |--- --- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-02 14

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-02 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-02 13:55:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > Bernd, if you have a compile farm account: It reproduces on gcc17 for me. Can you try gcc20: a dual Xeon X5670 2.93 GHz 12 cores 24 threads 24 GB RAM system I

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-02 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-02 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #13 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-02 13:43:19 UTC --- Downloading Fedora 14 now, but that'll take a while to get set up. Potentially helpful would be scheduling dumps from stage1 and stage2 compilers for these files; use "-da -fsched-ve

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-02 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #12 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-04-02 13:38:00 UTC --- Created attachment 23852 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23852 diff of disassemly Configuring with /mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ is enough

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-02 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target|{i686, x86_64}-linux-gnu|{i686,x86_64}-linux-gnu Target Mileston