http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #47 from gfunck at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-08 02:39:06 UTC ---
Author: gfunck
Date: Fri Apr 8 02:38:59 2011
New Revision: 172160
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172160
Log:
2011-04-07 Gary Funck
Merge tru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #45 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-05
22:19:21 UTC ---
Author: bernds
Date: Tue Apr 5 22:19:17 2011
New Revision: 172006
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172006
Log:
PR bootstrap/48403
* haifa-sched.c (sched
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #44 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-04-05 15:45:20
UTC ---
Just a note for those experiencing a comparison failure with
--disable-checking, I know what's causing it and should have a fix shortly.
That failure is being tracked by PR48444.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #43 from Eric Botcazou 2011-04-05
09:02:56 UTC ---
> mips64-linux, right?
No, IA-64/Linux, I was replying to Steve, but this is indeed not very clear.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #42 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-05 00:42:39
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #41)
> I can confirm that r171959 with --enable-checking bootstraps on
> f14/x86_64/linux, which was not previously the case. Thanks Bernd! I can also
> assert that it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #41 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-04-05
00:36:50 UTC ---
I can confirm that r171959 with --enable-checking bootstraps on
f14/x86_64/linux, which was not previously the case. Thanks Bernd! I can also
assert that it still fails with --disa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #40 from Andrew Pinski 2011-04-04
22:36:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 23873
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23873
Testcase for the MIPS ICE
./cc1 t1.c -mabi=32 -O2 -march=octeon -da -quiet
t1.c: In function ‘__udi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #39 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-04
22:27:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #37)
> Confirmed. Reduced testcase for -O2:
>
> typedef __builtin_va_list va_list;
>
> extern void exit (unsigned);
> extern int vfprintf (void *s, const char
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #38 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-04-04
21:37:21 UTC ---
YES, please revert whatever is causing this ASAP. Bootstrap has been broken for
much too long, on all the common devel arches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #37 from Eric Botcazou 2011-04-04
21:13:51 UTC ---
> /proj/opensrc/nightly/src/trunk/gcc/errors.c:86:1: internal compiler error: in
> max_issue, at haifa-sched.c:2524
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if ap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #36 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-04 19:57:14
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> Perhaps the patches can be reverted until it's clear what is wrong here? The
> trunk is now broken for 3 days, it will make things like bisecting regressions
> m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #35 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-04 19:56:49
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> (In reply to comment #29)
> > f14 x86_64, no ppl
> > Configured like so:
> > /mnt/share/src/gcc.svn-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --verbose
> > --pref
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #34 from Steven Bosscher 2011-04-04
19:53:52 UTC ---
Perhaps the patches can be reverted until it's clear what is wrong here? The
trunk is now broken for 3 days, it will make things like bisecting regressions
much harder later on if i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #33 from Andrew Pinski 2011-04-04
19:50:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #32)
>
> /proj/opensrc/nightly/src/trunk/gcc/errors.c:86:1: internal compiler error: in
> max_issue, at haifa-sched.c:2524
> Please submit a full bug report,
> w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
--- Comment #32 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #31 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-04 19:41:46
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> f14 x86_64, no ppl
> Configured like so:
> /mnt/share/src/gcc.svn-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --verbose
> --prefix=/mnt/share/bin/H-x86_64-gcc-trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #30 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-04 18:52:13
UTC ---
This
--enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --enable-shared --with-demangler-in-ld
--enable-cloog-backend=isl --with-ppl-include=/opt/gnu/include
--with-ppl-lib=/opt/gnu/lib64 --with-clo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #29 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-04-04
18:47:44 UTC ---
f14 x86_64, no ppl
%rpm -qa | grep mpfr
mpfr-devel-2.4.2-1.fc13.x86_64
mpfr-2.4.2-1.fc13.x86_64
/mnt/share/bld/gcc-trunk
%rpm -qa | grep
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #28 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-04 18:25:37
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> still fails bootstrap after #26
>
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/mnt/share/bld/gcc-trunk'
What is your target? It works for me on Linux/ia32 and Linux/x86-64.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #27
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #26 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-04
16:53:57 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Apr 4 16:53:51 2011
New Revision: 171942
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171942
Log:
Fix PR bootstrap/48403.
2011-04-04 Bernd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #24 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-04-04 06:30:12 UTC ---
Bootstrap comparison failure!
gcc/c-family/c-ada-spec.o differs
gcc/c-family/c-format.o differs
gcc/c-parser.o differs
gcc/cfgexpand.o differs
gcc/cp/parser.o differs
gcc/cse.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #23 from revital.eres at linaro dot org 2011-04-03 18:01:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > On Linux/x86, revision 171845 failed to bootstrap:
> There is bootsrap failure also on powerpc64-suse-linux usi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
revital.eres at linaro dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||revital.eres at linaro dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #21 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-03
00:10:06 UTC ---
Okay, the problem showed up on Fedora 14 (no idea why only there). The bug is
that I've missed some uses of last_scheduled_insn. Will probably be able to
post a fix on Monday.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #20 from Steven Bosscher 2011-04-02
19:55:07 UTC ---
Doesn't fix the comparison failure.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #19 from Steven Bosscher 2011-04-02
19:37:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 23856
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23856
Attempt at correcting memory management for scheduled_insns
Currently trying to see if this boots
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #18 from Steven Bosscher 2011-04-02
19:16:17 UTC ---
Something appears to be wrong with the allocation of scheduled_insns:
* It is VEC_alloc'ed on the heap in sched_extend_ready_list() but it is never
VEC_free'ed.
* It is allocated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #17 from Steven Bosscher 2011-04-02
15:08:33 UTC ---
FWIW: 171842 is OK, 171843 gives the comparison failure. No surprise, I
suppose, but for the record...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |---
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-02 14
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-02 13:55:31
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Bernd, if you have a compile farm account: It reproduces on gcc17 for me.
Can you try
gcc20: a dual Xeon X5670 2.93 GHz 12 cores 24 threads 24 GB RAM system
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #13 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-02
13:43:19 UTC ---
Downloading Fedora 14 now, but that'll take a while to get set up.
Potentially helpful would be scheduling dumps from stage1 and stage2 compilers
for these files; use "-da -fsched-ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #12 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-04-02 13:38:00
UTC ---
Created attachment 23852
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23852
diff of disassemly
Configuring with
/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++
is enough
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|{i686, x86_64}-linux-gnu|{i686,x86_64}-linux-gnu
Target Mileston
38 matches
Mail list logo