http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
--- Comment #18 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-21 09:05:18
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Fri Jan 21 09:05:14 2011
New Revision: 169080
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169080
Log:
2011-01-21 Kai Tietz
PR bootstrap/47215
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
--- Comment #17 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-17 21:56:13
UTC ---
Patch posted with reversal of java patch and fix in i386.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01071.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
--- Comment #15 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-16 08:34:56
UTC ---
I will prepare today a patch, which removes the part in java's decl.c, and adds
to i386 the additional check for initialized va_list_type_node in alignment
check.
Nevertheless, I see thi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
--- Comment #10 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-11 14:51:17
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Jan 11 14:51:07 2011
New Revision: 168662
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168662
Log:
2011-01-11 Kai Tietz
PR bootstrap/47215
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
--- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-11 12:06:38
UTC ---
Patch already posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00575.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-10 16:23:23
UTC ---
Issue here is that s390 uses for its va_list_node_type a record containing
long_integer_type_node type, which doesn't get initialized by java's decl.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-07 21:11:52
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Fri Jan 7 21:11:48 2011
New Revision: 168585
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168585
Log:
2011-01-07 Kai Tietz
PR bootstrap/47215
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-07 19:48:18
UTC ---
I am just about to test a patch for this. Java misses to build some type-nodes,
which are necessary for building the va_list type. It seems so that
unsigned_type_node is the culprit here.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-01-07
19:42:43 UTC ---
Confirmed on x86_64-apple-darwin10.6.0. After reverting revision 168569
bootstrapping succeeds.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--
20 matches
Mail list logo
