--- Comment #7 from dnovillo at google dot com 2009-01-28 18:56 ---
Subject: Re: [LTO] Bootstrap failed on RHEL5/ia32 and
RHEL5/ia64
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 13:49, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
wrote:
> I bootstrapped it on RHEL5/ia32, RHEL5/ia64 and Fedora 10/x86-64.
> The
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-28 18:49 ---
I bootstrapped it on RHEL5/ia32, RHEL5/ia64 and Fedora 10/x86-64.
There are many failures in testsuite. I don't believe they are
caused by my patch. Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-28 18:21 ---
Subject: Bug 38992
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jan 28 18:21:19 2009
New Revision: 143741
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143741
Log:
gcc/
2009-01-28 H.J. Lu
PR bootstrap/38992
* con
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 23:51 ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-01/msg01338.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 22:17 ---
I will give it a try.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38992
--- Comment #2 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-27 22:10
---
The libelf included in Red Hat based distros is different than the one we used
to develop LTO. There was a thread on IRC recently where Jakub proposed a way
of working around this:
(16:27:18) jakub: dnovillo: ver
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-27 22:00 ---
Yes this comes down to having the correct version of libelf.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38992
