[Bug bootstrap/38591] erratic comparison failures on very fast machines

2009-09-17 Thread Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de
--- Comment #10 from Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de 2009-09-17 17:40 --- Subject: Re: erratic comparison failures on very fast machines * ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote on Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 06:58:37PM CEST: > > No idea why the borked build does not fail but pick up auto

[Bug bootstrap/38591] erratic comparison failures on very fast machines

2009-09-17 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-17 16:58 --- > in gcc/Makefile.in, which means it was lacking $(CONFIG_H) thus lacking > dependency on auto-host.h. This was fixed in > > and glancing at that patch, t

[Bug bootstrap/38591] erratic comparison failures on very fast machines

2009-09-17 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-17 16:27 --- Does this also happen on trunk, or with branch-4_3 only? AFAICS 4.3.3 had sparseset.o: sparseset.c $(SYSTEM_H) sparseset.h in gcc/Makefile.in, which means it was lacking $(CONFIG_H) thus lacking dependency on auto-

[Bug bootstrap/38591] erratic comparison failures on very fast machines

2009-09-06 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-06 21:18 --- In comment #6. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Sta

[Bug bootstrap/38591] erratic comparison failures on very fast machines

2008-12-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-29 22:25 --- We also see this from time to time. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38591

[Bug bootstrap/38591] erratic comparison failures on very fast machines

2008-12-21 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-12-21 17:21 --- Each stage has its own directory and auto-host.h should be regenerated in each directory. I think it was regenerated more than once in the same directory. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38591

[Bug bootstrap/38591] erratic comparison failures on very fast machines

2008-12-21 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-21 17:12 --- > auto-host.h must exist when those files were compiled. I guess > it was generated more than once. My understanding is that it is re-generated at each stage: auto-host.h: cstamp-h ; @true cstamp-h: config.in co

[Bug bootstrap/38591] erratic comparison failures on very fast machines

2008-12-21 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-12-21 16:18 --- auto-host.h must exist when those files were compiled. I guess it was generated more than once. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38591

[Bug bootstrap/38591] erratic comparison failures on very fast machines

2008-12-21 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-21 16:07 --- > What are the differences? This is explained in the message. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38591

[Bug bootstrap/38591] erratic comparison failures on very fast machines

2008-12-21 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-12-21 15:20 --- What are the differences? While working on a patch, I had an uninitialized stack variable, which caused random comparison failures. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed