[Bug bootstrap/38523] [4.4 regression] arm build fails to link cc1-dummy

2009-02-18 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-18 21:54 --- Configuring with --disable-stage-checking, I see the following for cc1: -bash-3.2$ size cc1 text data bss dechex filename 28977798 496932 623152 300978821cb41da

[Bug bootstrap/38523] [4.4 regression] arm build fails to link cc1-dummy

2009-01-14 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #16 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-01-14 21:12 --- binutils 2.19 and CVS do not seem to cure the issue, I opened: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9743 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38523

[Bug bootstrap/38523] [4.4 regression] arm build fails to link cc1-dummy

2009-01-13 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #15 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-01-13 12:05 --- Add URL of gcc-patches discussion http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-01/msg00409.html -- laurent at guerby dot net changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug bootstrap/38523] [4.4 regression] arm build fails to link cc1-dummy

2009-01-05 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #14 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-01-05 12:05 --- Something like that? (untested) Index: configure.ac === --- configure.ac(revision 143046) +++ configure.ac(working copy) @@ -2904,6 +2904,9

[Bug bootstrap/38523] [4.4 regression] arm build fails to link cc1-dummy

2009-01-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-05 11:26 --- Disable stage1 checking for arm. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/38523] [4.4 regression] arm build fails to link cc1-dummy

2009-01-04 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #12 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-01-04 10:42 --- My second patch testing was successful but it added a lot of time to C only make bootstrap: 20h => 25h30, so about +25% vs --enable-stage1-checking=release What should we do? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug

[Bug bootstrap/38523] [4.4 regression] arm build fails to link cc1-dummy

2009-01-02 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #11 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-01-02 11:56 --- Yep I spotted my obvious mistake :), the patch I'm testing: Index: gcc/config.host === --- gcc/config.host (revision 143006) +++ gcc/config.host (w

[Bug bootstrap/38523] [4.4 regression] arm build fails to link cc1-dummy

2009-01-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-02 11:23 --- That won't work, this is surrounded by: case ${host} in rs6000-*-* \ | powerpc*-*-* ) You want to do it at the same level, so: --- config.host2008-12-27 10:12:25.0 +0100 +++ config.host2009-01-02 12:23:10

[Bug bootstrap/38523] [4.4 regression] arm build fails to link cc1-dummy

2009-01-02 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #9 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-01-02 10:11 --- Thanks Jakub, I'm testing: Index: gcc/config.host === --- gcc/config.host (revision 142984) +++ gcc/config.host (working copy) @@ -125,6 +125,9 @@

[Bug bootstrap/38523] [4.4 regression] arm build fails to link cc1-dummy

2009-01-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-01 11:19 --- arm could just add x-cflags-O1 to host_xmake_file in gcc/config.host, see what powerpc*-*-linux* host is doing. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38523

[Bug bootstrap/38523] [4.4 regression] arm build fails to link cc1-dummy

2008-12-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38523

[Bug bootstrap/38523] [4.4 regression] arm build fails to link cc1-dummy

2008-12-20 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #7 from laurent at guerby dot net 2008-12-20 12:21 --- ../trunk/configure --prefix=/n/50/guerby/install-trunk-142808 --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-nls --enable-threads=posix --with-mpfr=/opt/cfarm/mpfr-2.3.2 --build=arm-linux-gnueabi --host=arm-lin

[Bug bootstrap/38523] [4.4 regression] arm build fails to link cc1-dummy

2008-12-17 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #6 from laurent at guerby dot net 2008-12-17 11:13 --- I confirm that on trunk adding to configure: --enable-stage1-checking=release allows a full bootstrap. I did not test STAGE1_CFLAGS="-g -O" yet. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38523

[Bug bootstrap/38523] [4.4 regression] arm build fails to link cc1-dummy

2008-12-16 Thread doko at ubuntu dot com
--- Comment #5 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-16 08:49 --- The most recent complete build logs can be seen at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=gcc-snapshot&ver=20081130-1&arch=armel&stamp=1228429623&file=log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20414304/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-armel

[Bug bootstrap/38523] [4.4 regression] arm build fails to link cc1-dummy

2008-12-15 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #4 from laurent at guerby dot net 2008-12-15 15:54 --- More discussions here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-12/msg00861.html Also from Richard: Recent binutils should also be able to generate binaries exceeding this limit, though there is some runtime and additio

[Bug bootstrap/38523] [4.4 regression] arm build fails to link cc1-dummy

2008-12-15 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #3 from laurent at guerby dot net 2008-12-15 11:46 --- >From Richard Earnshaw: << GCC (to be precise binutils) has limit on the maximum program size on ARM, which is 32MBytes (based on the span of the BL instruction). Unfortunately, when GCC is built without optimization and

[Bug bootstrap/38523] [4.4 regression] arm build fails to link cc1-dummy

2008-12-15 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Comment #2 from schwab at suse dot de 2008-12-15 09:33 --- Probably related to bug 37739. Building with optimisation may be a workaround. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38523

[Bug bootstrap/38523] [4.4 regression] arm build fails to link cc1-dummy

2008-12-15 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #1 from laurent at guerby dot net 2008-12-15 09:23 --- 4.3.2 bootstrap doesn't fail in stage1 so this is a trunk regression. -- laurent at guerby dot net changed: What|Removed |Added -