[Bug bootstrap/37277] bootstrap failure with --with-dwarf2 on Solaris 10

2008-09-01 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-01 13:18 --- > Yes, I realise that, but it's still documented and it was apparently harmless > with 4.2.2 It's still documented because it's still useful on platforms that don't default to DWARF-2, which is not the case of So

[Bug bootstrap/37277] bootstrap failure with --with-dwarf2 on Solaris 10

2008-09-01 Thread jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2008-09-01 08:39 --- Yes, I realise that, but it's still documented and it was apparently harmless with 4.2.2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37277

[Bug bootstrap/37277] bootstrap failure with --with-dwarf2 on Solaris 10

2008-08-29 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-29 20:26 --- Remove --with-dwarf2, it is useless now. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug bootstrap/37277] bootstrap failure with --with-dwarf2 on Solaris 10

2008-08-29 Thread jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2008-08-29 13:36 --- I think this is a regression against 4.2.2 as I have working compilers for sparc-sun-solaris2.10 and sparc64-sun-solaris2.10 which were both configured with --with-dwarf2 (although I didn't build them myself so I'

[Bug bootstrap/37277] bootstrap failure with --with-dwarf2 on Solaris 10

2008-08-29 Thread jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2008-08-29 13:11 --- Created an attachment (id=16161) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16161&action=view) gcc/gtyp-input.list Here is the generated file with the duplicate entry -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/