[Bug bootstrap/26188] [4.2 Regression] 4.2.0 fails to compile on FreeBSD 4.11

2006-07-25 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-07-25 08:34 --- patch committed -- bonzini at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/26188] [4.2 Regression] 4.2.0 fails to compile on FreeBSD 4.11

2006-07-25 Thread bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-07-25 08:30 --- Subject: Bug 26188 Author: bonzini Date: Tue Jul 25 08:30:38 2006 New Revision: 115733 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115733 Log: config: 2006-07-25 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR b

[Bug bootstrap/26188] [4.2 Regression] 4.2.0 fails to compile on FreeBSD 4.11

2006-06-16 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
--- Comment #13 from gerald at pfeifer dot com 2006-06-16 15:25 --- Thanks, Paolo! I got confirmation by two testers who experienced the original problem that your latest patch addresses the issue, and they managed to bootstrap now. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26

[Bug bootstrap/26188] [4.2 Regression] 4.2.0 fails to compile on FreeBSD 4.11

2006-06-15 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-06-15 07:21 --- Created an attachment (id=11670) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11670&action=view) updated configure script for libdecnumber Gerald, here it is. Again, don't forget to disable fortran. -- http://

[Bug bootstrap/26188] [4.2 Regression] 4.2.0 fails to compile on FreeBSD 4.11

2006-06-14 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
--- Comment #11 from gerald at pfeifer dot com 2006-06-14 18:33 --- Sorry for the delay, Paolo: do you think you could provide a patched configure script for the new patch as well? Thanks! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26188

[Bug bootstrap/26188] [4.2 Regression] 4.2.0 fails to compile on FreeBSD 4.11

2006-06-07 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-06-08 06:20 --- Created an attachment (id=11631) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11631&action=view) really a different patch Sorry, I attached the wrong patch again. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=

[Bug bootstrap/26188] [4.2 Regression] 4.2.0 fails to compile on FreeBSD 4.11

2006-06-07 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-06-08 06:10 --- Created an attachment (id=11630) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11630&action=view) a supposedly correct patch No, the patch was wrong. Also the original proposed patch was right that some messages mist

[Bug bootstrap/26188] [4.2 Regression] 4.2.0 fails to compile on FreeBSD 4.11

2006-06-07 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
--- Comment #8 from gerald at pfeifer dot com 2006-06-07 21:37 --- I got feedback from volunteers who were able to test the proposed patch: Looks good, bootstrap succeeds! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26188

[Bug bootstrap/26188] [4.2 Regression] 4.2.0 fails to compile on FreeBSD 4.11

2006-06-07 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-06-07 12:01 --- Created an attachment (id=11623) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11623&action=view) updated libdecnumber configure script try this. don't forget to not include fortran because it includes stdint.m4 too.

[Bug bootstrap/26188] [4.2 Regression] 4.2.0 fails to compile on FreeBSD 4.11

2006-06-07 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
--- Comment #6 from gerald at pfeifer dot com 2006-06-07 11:18 --- (In reply to comment #5) > Created an attachment (id=11596) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11596&action=view) [edit] > > can anybody test this? Hi Paolo, I cannot test this myself at the moment, but

[Bug bootstrap/26188] [4.2 Regression] 4.2.0 fails to compile on FreeBSD 4.11

2006-06-05 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-06-05 10:20 --- Created an attachment (id=11596) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11596&action=view) patch to test can anybody test this? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26188

[Bug bootstrap/26188] [4.2 Regression] 4.2.0 fails to compile on FreeBSD 4.11

2006-06-04 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:36 --- i386-freebsd is a primary platform, so we should ensure that we can build there. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug bootstrap/26188] [4.2 Regression] 4.2.0 fails to compile on FreeBSD 4.11

2006-06-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 21:19 --- Any news? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26188

[Bug bootstrap/26188] [4.2 Regression] 4.2.0 fails to compile on FreeBSD 4.11

2006-03-23 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-03-23 10:05 --- I'm taking this. -- bonzini at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at g

[Bug bootstrap/26188] [4.2 Regression] 4.2.0 fails to compile on FreeBSD 4.11

2006-02-08 Thread Mark_Andrews at isc dot org
--- Comment #1 from Mark_Andrews at isc dot org 2006-02-09 02:23 --- Created an attachment (id=10811) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10811&action=view) patch for config/stdint.m4 Sub-optimal patch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26188

[Bug bootstrap/26188] [4.2 Regression] 4.2.0 fails to compile on FreeBSD 4.11

2006-02-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bonzini at gnu dot org Component|c