[Bug bootstrap/117677] [15 Regression] Regression in fail, at selftest.cc:47

2024-11-21 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117677 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/117677] [15 Regression] Regression in fail, at selftest.cc:47

2024-11-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117677 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4574f15bb305204fb615756148da8f214156c787 commit r15-5575-g4574f15bb305204fb615756148da8f214156c787 Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug bootstrap/117677] [15 Regression] Regression in fail, at selftest.cc:47

2024-11-21 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117677 --- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law --- The patch was enough to get m68k past the fail point.

[Bug bootstrap/117677] [15 Regression] Regression in fail, at selftest.cc:47

2024-11-21 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117677 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11

[Bug bootstrap/117677] [15 Regression] Regression in fail, at selftest.cc:47

2024-11-20 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117677 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org K

[Bug bootstrap/117677] [15 Regression] Regression in fail, at selftest.cc:47

2024-11-20 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117677 --- Comment #8 from Sam James --- Note that the bot uses --with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=intel --with-fpmath=sse.

[Bug bootstrap/117677] [15 Regression] Regression in fail, at selftest.cc:47

2024-11-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117677 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #8) > Note that the bot uses --with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=intel --with-fpmath=sse. I was trying that as well and it didn't fail either.

[Bug bootstrap/117677] [15 Regression] Regression in fail, at selftest.cc:47

2024-11-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117677 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- I can't reproduce this in my i686-linux builds unfortunately. --- gcc/json-parsing.cc.jj 2024-11-19 10:23:59.183145351 +0100 +++ gcc/json-parsing.cc 2024-11-20 16:02:18.968119550 +0100 @@ -2024,33 +2024

[Bug bootstrap/117677] [15 Regression] Regression in fail, at selftest.cc:47

2024-11-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117677 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/117677] [15 Regression] Regression in fail, at selftest.cc:47

2024-11-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117677 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4) > Does -Wfloat-equal warn about this? Maybe it'd be worth adding to the > warnings enabled when building GCC? I don't think we should use that warning when buildi

[Bug bootstrap/117677] [15 Regression] Regression in fail, at selftest.cc:47

2024-11-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117677 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libdiagnostics |bootstrap Target Milestone|---