[Bug analyzer/94689] arrays of functions are not meaningful

2020-08-13 Thread pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94689 --- Comment #6 from pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks - I will rerun the static analyzer on the codebase that previously crashed the static analyzer and report back.

[Bug analyzer/94689] arrays of functions are not meaningful

2020-08-13 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94689 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/94689] arrays of functions are not meaningful

2020-05-12 Thread pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94689 --- Comment #4 from pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org --- Unfortunately a fix for this didn't make it into 10.1. We can still not analyze racket source code due to this issue.

[Bug analyzer/94689] arrays of functions are not meaningful

2020-04-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94689 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Guess get_or_create_mem_ref should punt or do something else for pointers to functions, trying to create an ARRAY_TYPE of FUNCTION_TYPE (or METHOD_TYPE) is rejected by build_array_type.

[Bug analyzer/94689] arrays of functions are not meaningful

2020-04-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94689 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug analyzer/94689] arrays of functions are not meaningful

2020-04-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94689 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Version|unknown