--- Comment #11 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 04:47 ---
Fixed
--
aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
--- Comment #10 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 01:33
---
*** Bug 33703 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33634
--- Comment #9 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-10-05
19:02 ---
Subject: Re: bootstrap with ada failed
> --- Comment #8 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-05 18:17
> ---
> Actually, Dave tells me in one of the "Ignored" entries that he posted by
> e-m
--- Comment #8 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-05 18:17 ---
Actually, Dave tells me in one of the "Ignored" entries that he posted by
e-mail that the earlier patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg00186.html had already fixed the
bootstrap problem, but that he s
--- Comment #7 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-05 17:44 ---
Possible fix at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg00302.html
--
aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-10-05
03:52 ---
Subject: Re: bootstrap with ada failed
Ignore.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33634
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-10-05
03:48 ---
Subject: Re: bootstrap with ada failed
Ignore.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33634
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 21:31
---
> 128907 is ok. 128908 is broken.
OK, thanks for confirming.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-10-03
21:23 ---
Subject: Re: bootstrap with ada failed
> --- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 06:08
> ---
> Try to revert the big SRA patch.
128907 is ok. 128908 is broken.
Dave
-
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 06:08
---
Try to revert the big SRA patch.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-02 23:46 ---
This occurs in stage3 indicating a miscompiled compiler.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33634
12 matches
Mail list logo