[Bug ada/26306] Use of volatile array with bounds determined at run time.

2006-11-01 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-01 20:02 --- > this bug is still present in trunk: Right. It may already be fixed in our internal tree though. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/26306] Use of volatile array with bounds determined at run time.

2006-11-01 Thread charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-01 19:39 --- You built GCC with --disable-checking, which is not a good idea (in particular with GCC >= 4.1, at a minimum you should use --enable-checking=release). this bug is still present in trunk: << gcc -c scratch.adb +==

[Bug ada/26306] Use of volatile array with bounds determined at run time.

2006-10-20 Thread jeff at thecreems dot com
--- Comment #4 from jeff at thecreems dot com 2006-10-20 16:56 --- I just did a fresh Gcc build today this no longer appears to be a problem URL: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk Repository Root: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc Repository UUID: 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4 Revision: 117

[Bug ada/26306] Use of volatile array with bounds determined at run time.

2006-02-15 Thread charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-15 18:05 --- Thanks, reopening. Confirmed on trunk with simple command: $ gcc -c scratch.adb +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 4.2.0 20060210 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu) GCC e

[Bug ada/26306] Use of volatile array with bounds determined at run time.

2006-02-15 Thread ben dot midgley at ultra-datel dot com
--- Comment #2 from ben dot midgley at ultra-datel dot com 2006-02-15 17:56 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Could you please send full sources to reproduce this problem ? thanks. > Arno Arno, what follows is a simple bit of code which causes the assertion failure described in tree.c, In

[Bug ada/26306] Use of volatile array with bounds determined at run time.

2006-02-15 Thread charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-15 16:52 --- Could you please send full sources to reproduce this problem ? thanks. Arno -- charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added