--- Comment #17 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-28 11:46
---
> Don't remember what fixed comment #13. Possibly, a change just
> made the issue latent.
OK, thanks. Here is what I needed on my 4.1 branch:
Index: cfgexpand.c
===
--- Comment #16 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-03-28
00:49 ---
Subject: Re: raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow or erroneous memory access
> Dave, does the problem still exist on the 4.2 branch for the PA? I'm
> now seeing it (same backtrace) on a patched 4.1 bran
--- Comment #15 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-27 22:37
---
Dave, does the problem still exist on the 4.2 branch for the PA? I'm
now seeing it (same backtrace) on a patched 4.1 branch for x86-64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24994
--- Comment #14 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-06 01:29
---
(gdb) r `cat xx.sh`
Starting program: /home/dave/gcc-4.2/objdir/gcc/gnat1 `cat xx.sh`
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0042a09c in gt_ggc_mx_basic_block_def (x_p=Variable "x_p" is not availab
--- Comment #13 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-06 00:12
---
Sadly, a slightly different error now appears:
../../xgcc -B../../ -c -O2 -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -fno-common -gnatpg -gnata -I- -I../rts -I.
-I/home/da
ve/gc
--- Comment #12 from law at redhat dot com 2006-01-04 16:36 ---
Fixed by attached patch. Would appreciate it if folks could verify ada is
bootstrapping again on PPC, HPUX and any other platform reported as failing.
--
law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #11 from law at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-04 16:29 ---
Subject: Bug 24994
Author: law
Date: Wed Jan 4 16:29:32 2006
New Revision: 109335
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109335
Log:
PR ada/24994
* tree-cfg.c (bsi_replace): Remove the
--- Comment #10 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-12-20 21:19 ---
Bootstrap started to fail after the following patch:
Index: gcc/ChangeLog
===
--- gcc/ChangeLog (revision 108421)
+++ gcc/ChangeLog (revision 1
--- Comment #9 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-17 14:54 ---
../../xgcc -B../../ -c -O2 -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -fno-common -gnatpg -gnata -I- -I../rts -I.
-I/home/da
ve/gcc-4.2/gcc/gcc/ada /home/dave/gcc-4.2/gcc/gcc/ada/m
--- Comment #8 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-12-17
12:19 ---
I suppose this is what I experience too on sparc/sparc64 linux, see also
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-12/msg00491.html
I get this on trunk Sat Dec 17 00:14:08 UTC 2005 (revision 108698):
../../xgcc -B.
--- Comment #7 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-12-16 07:51 ---
4.2, see PR25436 for last known working revision number
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24994
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-16 06:50
---
So, in the end, is this 4.1 or 4.2?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24994
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 23:45 ---
>From the dup bug, this is also reproducible on x86-linux-gnu too.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 23:43 ---
*** Bug 25436 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 02:29 ---
Strangely, this didn't occur with using 4.1.0 and the same bootstrap version
of gcc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24994
--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 02:19 ---
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x003ea9cc in gt_ggc_mx_basic_block_def (x_p=0x0) at gtype-desc.c:446
446 gt_ggc_m_9tree_node ((*x).stmt_list);
(gdb)
(gdb) bt
#0 0x003ea9cc in gt_ggc_m
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-23 11:10
---
On PowerPC, I get with tree checking:
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.1.0 20051123 (prerelease) (powerpc-apple-darwin8) GCC error: |
| tree check: expect
17 matches
Mail list logo
