--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-23
18:42 ---
You need a recent GCC 4.1 for this to "work" as expected, so
gcc 3.4 is indeed not expected to work in this case.
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-23
15:12 ---
This is a target bug.
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/ee1a8b8db84c88f/
2195130b88e4dc9d?
lnk=st&q=Ada+exception+block+does+NOT+work%3F&rnum=1#2195130b88e4dc9d
Most li
--- Additional Comments From kuan_long at hotmail dot com 2005-08-23 14:43
---
-gnato still fail in Mingw 4.1 ,the OS is windows XP
gcc -v
Reading specs from C:/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/3.4.2/specs
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --with-gcc --with-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as --
host=
mi
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-23
11:25 ---
You need to use -gnato if you want an exception here.
This test case in any case is handled "as expected" in GCC 4.1 as far as I can
see, unless the mingw build is too old or using non standard sources, but
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-08-22 20:48
---
Ok it's always better to put the context in bugzilla, I don't read comp.lang.ada
regularly anymore these days :).
I haven't seen reports of mingw Ada 4.1 testing on [EMAIL PROTECTED],
could someone post one or p
--- Additional Comments From listor1 dot rombobeorn at comhem dot se
2005-08-22 20:39 ---
The behaviour reported by Windows users is that on the first division by zero an
exception is raised and handled just fine, but the second time the program
enters an infinite loop. Gnat 3.15p, Mingw
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-08-22 20:01
---
With 4.1.0 20050822 (experimental) on x86-linux, I get as output
27 times "average: 10.00" followed by three times "average:error here!"
which seems the correct behaviour since you do for the three last iteration
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23514
