--- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-04 15:39
---
> Let's mark as waiting for feedback, if they don't appear again in
> gcc-testresults for a while, then let's consider it fixed.
They pass for me now with 4.1.0, thanks.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org c
--- Comment #9 from laurent at guerby dot net 2006-02-15 06:35 ---
These were never real failures, just some tests that depend on some cpu time to
real time properties that we failed to meet with the agressive sleep time
reduction (via the One_Second trick) we apply on original ACATS tes
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-13 04:40 ---
Isn't this fixed now or just worked around?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21317
--- Comment #7 from guerby at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-26 20:42 ---
Subject: Bug 21317
Author: guerby
Date: Thu Jan 26 20:42:23 2006
New Revision: 110272
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110272
Log:
2006-01-26 Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR ada/
--- Comment #6 from guerby at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-26 20:40 ---
Subject: Bug 21317
Author: guerby
Date: Thu Jan 26 20:40:46 2006
New Revision: 110271
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110271
Log:
2006-01-26 Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR ada/
--- Comment #5 from guerby at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-26 20:39 ---
Subject: Bug 21317
Author: guerby
Date: Thu Jan 26 20:39:16 2006
New Revision: 110270
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110270
Log:
2006-01-26 Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR ada/
--- Comment #4 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-11-16 21:04 ---
I have seen the three tests (c954025 c954026 c99004a) failing from time to time
on my x86 or x86_64-linux builds on 4.0 and 4.1, I'll look into increasing
delay values (which are currently shortened in GCC version of ACAT
