[Bug ada/15606] Legal program rejected, RM 8.2(22)

2024-10-26 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15606 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou --- Still fails on mainline.

[Bug ada/15606] Legal program rejected, RM 8.2(22)

2015-12-05 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15606 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW CC|

[Bug ada/15606] Legal program rejected, RM 8.2(22)

2014-02-27 Thread nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15606 --- Comment #8 from nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr --- Confirmed on 4.9-20140218.

[Bug ada/15606] Legal program rejected, RM 8.2(22)

2011-08-30 Thread sam at rfc1149 dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15606 --- Comment #7 from Samuel Tardieu 2011-08-30 23:21:41 UTC --- Je suis absent jusqu'au 5 septembre sans accès à mon courrier électronique. I am on vacation until September 5 without email access.

[Bug ada/15606] Legal program rejected, RM 8.2(22)

2011-08-30 Thread nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15606 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug ada/15606] Legal program rejected, RM 8.2(22)

2009-08-06 Thread ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org
--- Comment #5 from ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org 2009-08-06 20:27 --- Confirmed on 4.4.1. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15606

[Bug ada/15606] Legal program rejected, RM 8.2(22)

2007-12-13 Thread sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-13 13:56 --- Confirmed on gcc version 4.3.0 20071213 -- sam at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/15606] Legal program rejected, RM 8.2(22)

2007-05-03 Thread ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org
--- Comment #3 from ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org 2007-05-03 19:15 --- I disagree. As highlighted at the beginning of this PR, per 8.2(2), the instance becomes visibleonly _after_ its declaration, i.e. at the semicolon. Before the semicolon, the two "Foo"s are NOT ambiguous becaus

[Bug ada/15606] Legal program rejected, RM 8.2(22)

2007-05-02 Thread charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-02 16:13 --- Error message looks right to me, the instantiation is not finished so you cannot use foo twice here without disambiguating it, e.g: procedure FOO is new Standard.foo; Arno -- charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org c

[Bug ada/15606] Legal program rejected, RM 8.2(22)

2004-10-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-01 00:48 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E