[Bug ada/115305] [15 Regression] many (162) acats regressions on i686-darwin9

2024-10-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115305 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug ada/115305] [15 Regression] many (162) acats regressions on i686-darwin9

2024-06-04 Thread dkm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115305 --- Comment #9 from Marc Poulhiès --- cxa4001 should be fixed since https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=e0ab5ee9bed5cbad9ae344a23ff0d302b8279d32

[Bug ada/115305] [15 Regression] many (162) acats regressions on i686-darwin9

2024-05-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115305 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i686-darwin9 Target Milestone|---

[Bug ada/115305] [15 Regression] many (162) acats regressions on i686-darwin9

2024-05-31 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115305 --- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #7) > They might come from https://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gcc-gitref.cgi?r=r15-615 > and, in particular, the change made to libgnarl/s-osinte__darwin.ads, in > which case t

[Bug ada/115305] [15 Regression] many (162) acats regressions on i686-darwin9

2024-05-31 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115305 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- They might come from https://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gcc-gitref.cgi?r=r15-615 and, in particular, the change made to libgnarl/s-osinte__darwin.ads, in which case the way out would be to duplicate libgnat/s-osloc

[Bug ada/115305] [15 Regression] many (162) acats regressions on i686-darwin9

2024-05-31 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115305 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe --- a quick look at current results for other platform versions suggests that: * x86_64-darwin10 [64b runtimes, but 32b kernel] is also affected but * from darwin11+ [64 kernel] the main fail is FAIL: cxa4001

[Bug ada/115305] [15 Regression] many (162) acats regressions on i686-darwin9

2024-05-31 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115305 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Version|14.0|15.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/115305] [15 Regression] many (162) acats regressions on i686-darwin9.

2024-05-31 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115305 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- Created attachment 58322 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58322&action=edit between 856 and 889 likewise.

[Bug ada/115305] [15 Regression] many (162) acats regressions on i686-darwin9.

2024-05-31 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115305 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- Created attachment 58321 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58321&action=edit between 792 and 856 likewise

[Bug ada/115305] [15 Regression] many (162) acats regressions on i686-darwin9.

2024-05-31 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115305 --- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe --- Created attachment 58320 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58320&action=edit between 644 and 792

[Bug ada/115305] [15 Regression] many (162) acats regressions on i686-darwin9.

2024-05-31 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115305 --- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe --- Created attachment 58319 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58319&action=edit between 386 and 644 the results have been somewhat turbulent - so posting the ranges I have in case it helps