[Bug awt/16825] Bad results for QuadCurve2D.solveQuadratic

2005-08-24 Thread fitzsim at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-24 19:43 --- *** Bug 22724 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug AWT/16825] Bad results for QuadCurve2D.solveQuadratic

2004-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 23:32 --- Note the java "standard" does not require the FPU set to double-precision except when working in strict mode (this was changed after 1.0 IIRC). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16825

[Bug AWT/16825] Bad results for QuadCurve2D.solveQuadratic

2004-11-09 Thread sven at physto dot se
--- Additional Comments From sven at physto dot se 2004-11-09 23:22 --- This isn't a Awt or libgcj bug itself, but rather an effect of the extended-mode of FPU being the default leading to inconsistent results with 64-bit doubles. A suggestion for a 'fix' is to set the FPU to 64-bit dou