[Bug gcov-profile/114851] Alternative to -Wmisexpect from LLVM in GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114851 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Zaitsev --- > Though I do wonder if the "hints" are used instead of the PGO here. We already discussed this question a bit in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112806 . If I understand correctly, no clea

[Bug gcov-profile/114851] New: Alternative to -Wmisexpect from LLVM in GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114851 Bug ID: 114851 Summary: Alternative to -Wmisexpect from LLVM in GCC Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: g

[Bug tree-optimization/114761] Ignored [[likely]] attribute with multiple if statements doing the same thing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114761 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Zaitsev --- > Is this based on real code or you just was looking at the differences between > gcc and clang here? Really, not on a real code. I came up with this example when I found that GCC for this example does

[Bug tree-optimization/114761] New: Ignored [[likely]] attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114761 Bug ID: 114761 Summary: Ignored [[likely]] attribute Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimizatio

[Bug gcov-profile/112829] Dump PGO profiles to a memory buffer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112829 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Zaitsev --- Am I right that right now in GCC there are no ready-to-use alternatives to "int __llvm_profile_write_buffer(char *Buffer)" from LLVM and it should be implemented somehow manually (as you described)?

[Bug gcov-profile/112829] New: Dump PGO profiles to a memory buffer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112829 Bug ID: 112829 Summary: Dump PGO profiles to a memory buffer Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gcov-pro

[Bug gcov-profile/112806] Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) policy regarding explicit user optimization hint behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112806 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Zaitsev --- > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.2.0/gcc/Other-Builtins.html#index-fprofile-arcs-1 I already read this and still do not understand the actual behavior. If PGO profiles show that the branch is "co

[Bug gcov-profile/112717] .gcda profiles compatibility guarantees between GCC versions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112717 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Zaitsev --- > I thought this was documented but I don't see. There is no guarantee for > forward or backwards compatibility at all. In fact iirc there is a version > stored in the files to make sure the correct ve

[Bug gcov-profile/112717] New: .gcda profiles compatibility guarantees between GCC versions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112717 Bug ID: 112717 Summary: .gcda profiles compatibility guarantees between GCC versions Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/112492] New: Add LLVM BOLT support to the GCC build scripts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112492 Bug ID: 112492 Summary: Add LLVM BOLT support to the GCC build scripts Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c++/96821] [concepts] Incorrect evaluation of concept with ill-formed expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96821 Alexander Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zamazan4ik at tut dot by --- Comment