https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105371
--- Comment #7 from luoxudong ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #5)
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 07:51:10PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105371
> >
> > --- Comment #4 from anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105371
--- Comment #6 from luoxudong ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #5)
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 07:51:10PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105371
> >
> > --- Comment #4 from anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105371
--- Comment #3 from luoxudong ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> So, what do you believe the correct output should be?
I think the output when the mask is constant should be consistent with the
result when the mask is variable.
1.The ou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105372
Bug ID: 105372
Summary: The result of the merge function is different when
it's type of parameters is the extensions type of
derived type
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105371
Bug ID: 105371
Summary: The result of the merge function is different when
it's type of parameters is the extensions type of
derived type
Product: gcc
Version: