https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98859
Will Wray changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wjwray at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107662
Bug ID: 107662
Summary: [10 concepts] ICE using concept with dependent
template parameter to define variable
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105061
--- Comment #1 from Will Wray ---
Hmm, the accepted simplified version ^^^ with typename parameter removed
is then rejected if 'unsigned' is replaced with 'uint32_t' from
#include
template
struct uint_offset_bitfield { uint32_t :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105061
Bug ID: 105061
Summary: [9/10 Regression] [c++2a+] anonymous bitfield
templated offset rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: reject
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103238
--- Comment #4 from Will Wray ---
First cut implementation in two patches, submitted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/585105.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55227
Will Wray changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51828|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55227
Will Wray changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51737|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103238
--- Comment #2 from Will Wray ---
(It was my own 'interesting suggestion' to myself; going stir crazy coding!)
(Apologies if I stirred anything other than thought.)
Thank you for emphasising the important point on DRs. It's true that some
C++ D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103238
Bug ID: 103238
Summary: c++ Feature: array-copy experimental extensions
implementing P1997
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84930
Will Wray changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wjwray at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103140
--- Comment #1 from Will Wray ---
Created attachment 51750
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51750&action=edit
c++: __builtin_bit_cast To C array target type
Proposed patch, submitted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103140
Bug ID: 103140
Summary: __builtin_bit_cast To C array target type
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: patch
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55227
--- Comment #11 from Will Wray ---
Created attachment 51737
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51737&action=edit
Proposed patch Nov 4
Sent to gcc-patches for review
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/583379
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55227
--- Comment #10 from Will Wray ---
Note that the initialization of 'c0' takes a different codepath:
struct C {char a[2];};
C c0{.a="a"}; // [dcl.init.aggr]
C c1{.a=""};
C c2{.a={"a"}};
C c3{.a={""}};
c1, c2 and c3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55227
--- Comment #9 from Will Wray ---
Adding a reshape_iter, and checking has_designator_problem,
for a brace-enclosed string-literal fixes this secondary issue
+ reshape_iter e {CONSTRUCTOR_ELT (stripped_a_init, 0), e.cur + 1};
+ if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55227
--- Comment #8 from Will Wray ---
The patch above doesn't address the secondary issue,
of ignored and unchecked nested designators:
C b {{.bogus="b"}};
Perhaps reshape_init should be recursed into once more?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55227
--- Comment #7 from Will Wray ---
The patch below fixes the main issue (I think, checking)
by adding first_initializer_p to the error condition
it errors only where designators are not allowed.
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.c b/gcc/cp/decl.c
index 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55227
Will Wray changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wjwray at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95806
Will Wray changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wjwray at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101960
Bug ID: 101960
Summary: std::tuple with an array element is rejected as a
named return type
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90031
Will Wray changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wjwray at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100231
Will Wray changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wjwray at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100459
Bug ID: 100459
Summary: [10/11 regression] constexpr decltype(auto) variable
declaration bogus cv qual error
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96268
--- Comment #4 from Will Wray ---
This now appears fixed on 11 trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99472
Bug ID: 99472
Summary: [modules] std=c++2b flag appears incompatible with
C++20 module code
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99471
Bug ID: 99471
Summary: Allow conversion from array of unknown bound to actual
known bound
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93480
--- Comment #4 from Will Wray ---
Thanks Jakub;
I applied your patch to trunk and ran more test cases for
nested arrays (including zero-size in various positions),
union element type, base classes - all passed as expected.
I tried to grok the pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93480
--- Comment #2 from Will Wray ---
For reference, here's a macro-free workaround to provide portable
operator<=> for templated classes with array members, defaulting
where possible (current Clang and MSVC) otherwise dispatching to
a user-defined i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93480
Will Wray changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wjwray at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97246
Bug ID: 97246
Summary: [10.1 regression] mismatched argument pack lengths
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
30 matches
Mail list logo
