http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52453
--- Comment #2 from Allen Wu 2012-03-01
16:40:07 UTC ---
Thank you for your response.
But I cannot see any difference between &Test::func and &(Test::func). Does
C++ standard specify &(Test::func) is illegal?
Thanks in advance.
Allen
2012/3/2 re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52453
Bug #: 52453
Summary: compiling error when get address of a virtual
function(invalid use of non-static member function)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.4
