[Bug gcov-profile/117415] Bogus execution count for assignment to *func()

2024-11-01 Thread wentaoz5 at illinois dot edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117415 --- Comment #2 from Wentao Zhang --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I think this is the same underlying issue as PR 117412. Hi Andrew, thanks for your reply! In practice we've seen many such cases caused by multi-line expression

[Bug gcov-profile/117415] New: Bogus execution count for assignment to *func()

2024-11-01 Thread wentaoz5 at illinois dot edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117415 Bug ID: 117415 Summary: Bogus execution count for assignment to *func() Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug gcov-profile/117412] New: Bogus execution count for assignment with function call

2024-11-01 Thread wentaoz5 at illinois dot edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117412 Bug ID: 117412 Summary: Bogus execution count for assignment with function call Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug gcov-profile/116452] Inconsistent way of reporting negative counter values

2024-08-21 Thread wentaoz5 at illinois dot edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116452 --- Comment #2 from Wentao Zhang --- Thanks for your prompt response! I was actually thinking: should we let line coverage also report "-125" instead of "#" so that people know the profile is invalid?

[Bug gcov-profile/116452] New: Inconsistent way of reporting negative counter values

2024-08-21 Thread wentaoz5 at illinois dot edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116452 Bug ID: 116452 Summary: Inconsistent way of reporting negative counter values Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug gcov-profile/116279] New: Branch coverage measure is reported in inconsistent ways for comma operators

2024-08-07 Thread wentaoz5 at illinois dot edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116279 Bug ID: 116279 Summary: Branch coverage measure is reported in inconsistent ways for comma operators Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug c/115185] Missing "too long" warning when string-array size doesn't include NULL byte

2024-07-24 Thread wentaoz5 at illinois dot edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115185 --- Comment #20 from Wentao Zhang --- (In reply to Wentao Zhang from comment #18) > > will get expanded to > > [POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_CONTROL_START_THRESHOLD] = { > .prop_name = "CHARGE_CONTROL_START_THRESHOLD", >

[Bug c/115185] Missing "too long" warning when string-array size doesn't include NULL byte

2024-07-24 Thread wentaoz5 at illinois dot edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115185 Wentao Zhang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wentaoz5 at illinois dot edu --- Comment

[Bug gcov-profile/115047] Inconsistent MC/DC reported by GCC and LLVM

2024-06-04 Thread wentaoz5 at illinois dot edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115047 Wentao Zhang changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/115047] New: Inconsistent MC/DC reported by GCC and LLVM

2024-05-12 Thread wentaoz5 at illinois dot edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115047 Bug ID: 115047 Summary: Inconsistent MC/DC reported by GCC and LLVM Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gcov