[Bug c++/104111] [DR2589] Concept evaluation depends on context where it was first checked

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104111 --- Comment #10 from W E Brown --- (In reply to Eric Estievenart from comment #9) Sorry, but I find neither "weirdness" nor "spooky"-ness in the comment #9 code as shown. Rather, I believe it to be simply an example of a program that the C++ s

[Bug c++/108205] New: ICE following "unused parameter" in precondition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108205 Bug ID: 108205 Summary: ICE following "unused parameter" in precondition Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/107778] handle_contract_violation should reflect _GLIBCXX_VERBOSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107778 --- Comment #10 from W E Brown --- > On Dec 22, 2022, at 6:51 PM, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org > wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107778 > > --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- > The master branch has been updated by

[Bug c++/108052] New: forward-declared constexpr variable template unusable in constexpr context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108052 Bug ID: 108052 Summary: forward-declared constexpr variable template unusable in constexpr context Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug c++/103049] [C++23] P0849R8 - auto(x): decay-copy in the language

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103049 --- Comment #2 from W E Brown --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1) > Patch on review. In the proposed patch, I respectfully recommend a slight rewording of the new pedwarn messages in gcc/cp/semantics.c and gcc/cp/typeck2.c: eithe

[Bug c++/101181] New: ICE when using an alias template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101181 Bug ID: 101181 Summary: ICE when using an alias template Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ A

[Bug c++/100687] New: [modules, concepts] imported concept gives different result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100687 Bug ID: 100687 Summary: [modules, concepts] imported concept gives different result Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/100335] Using statement of a ref-qualified method from base class: method not callable on derived object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100335 --- Comment #4 from W E Brown --- I won't comment on any compiler's behavior, but do want to thank you for reminding me of [namespace.udecl]/14: "When a using-declarator brings declarations from a base class into a derived class, member functio

[Bug c++/100335] Using statement of a ref-qualified method from base class: method not callable on derived object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100335 W E Brown changed: What|Removed |Added CC||webrown.cpp at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/99686] ICE when using both concepts and full specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99686 --- Comment #4 from W E Brown --- (In reply to Steven Sun from comment #3) > I would expect the complete specialization is full > specialization for both primary templates. No, any given explicit or partial specialization can be a specializ

[Bug c++/99686] ICE when using both concepts and full specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99686 W E Brown changed: What|Removed |Added CC||webrown.cpp at gmail dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/98735] New: ICE with -std=c++20 -fmodules-ts -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98735 Bug ID: 98735 Summary: ICE with -std=c++20 -fmodules-ts -fsanitize=undefined Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone