https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105364
--- Comment #5 from wavexx at thregr dot org ---
Verified today on debian unstable which just updated the gcc12 snapshot.
Thx for the quick fix to all.
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: plugins
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: wavexx at thregr dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Warnings generated by lto-wrapper do not seem to check the current terminal
settings (TERM=dumb doesn't do anything u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69471
--- Comment #19 from wavexx at thregr dot org ---
I don't follow gcc development too closely. I expected this bug to be closed
when the relevant patch was applied automatically, but I could test if this
still apllied.
Which gcc relea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69471
--- Comment #17 from wavexx at thregr dot org ---
I wish this would be given a nudge, considering the patch. This has been pushed
to new releases since 2016 :(
It's not a show-stopper, but it does cause unexpected behavior which is quite
ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69471
--- Comment #4 from wavexx at thregr dot org ---
Since I couldn't find documentation for it either, doesn't
-march=haswell by itself imply all associated ISA features?
If so, why -march=native expands to all individual features explicitly?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69471
--- Comment #2 from wavexx at thregr dot org ---
On 25/01/16 18:38, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Why would either you or the makefile add something like -march=opteron on a
> haswell host?
>
> Surely the makefile should only add
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: wavexx at thregr dot org
Target Milestone: ---
On a haswell host, the following:
gcc -march=native -march=opteron
or
gcc -march=opteron -march=native
both emit cod
