[Bug tree-optimization/118194] [12/13/14/15 regression] spurious warning with -Wmaybe-uninitialized with mlock since r11-959-gb825a22890740f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118194 --- Comment #8 from vvinayag at arm dot com --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #6) > (In reply to vvinayag from comment #5) > > (In reply to Sam James from comment #4) > > > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1) >

[Bug tree-optimization/118194] [12/13/14/15 regression] spurious warning with -Wmaybe-uninitialized with mlock since r11-959-gb825a22890740f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118194 vvinayag at arm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vvinayag at arm dot com

[Bug testsuite/99731] g++.dg/modules/alias-1_a.H: error: failed to read compiled module: No such file or directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99731 vvinayag at arm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vvinayag at arm dot com

[Bug tree-optimization/106878] [11/12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed at -O2 with pointers and bitwise calculation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878 vvinayag at arm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vvinayag at arm dot com

[Bug other/107620] Build errors when using sphinx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107620 --- Comment #2 from vvinayag at arm dot com --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Confirmed. Btw. what revision do you build and what command do you use? Could you please clarify what you are referring to, for the revision

[Bug other/107620] New: Build errors when using sphinx

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: vvinayag at arm dot com Target Milestone: --- I am noticing errors with use of sphinx when building: Build machine: x86_64-none-linux-gnu Host: x86_64-none-linux-gnu Target: aarch64-none-elf or arm-none-eabi SPHINXBUILD= make[2

[Bug libstdc++/100017] [11/12 regression] error: 'fenv_t' has not been declared in '::' -- canadian compilation fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017 --- Comment #45 from vvinayag at arm dot com --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #44) > *** Bug 103570 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Hi Jonathan, I see that you plan to fix this soon (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi

[Bug libstdc++/100017] [11/12 regression] error: 'fenv_t' has not been declared in '::' -- canadian compilation fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017 vvinayag at arm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vvinayag at arm dot com

[Bug target/100757] [12 Regression] arm: ICE (unrecognizable insn) with MVE VPSELQ_S since r12-834-ga6eacbf10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100757 vvinayag at arm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vvinayag at arm dot com

[Bug sanitizer/100379] cyclades.h is removed from linux kernel header files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100379 vvinayag at arm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vvinayag at arm dot com

[Bug libstdc++/96029] [8 Regression] Inconsistencies with associative/unordered containers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96029 vvinayag at arm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vvinayag at arm dot com

[Bug c/97447] New: During IPA pass: modref: ICE on gcc.dg/atomic/pr65345-4.c

Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: vvinayag at arm dot com Target Milestone: --- The test gcc.dg/atomic/pr65345-4.c causes ICE on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf and aarch64-none-linux-gnu. On aarch64-none-linux-gnu: spawn /obj/gcc/gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/97041] New: ICE during RTL pass: sched_fusion: in operator[], at vec.h:880

Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: vvinayag at arm dot com Target Milestone: --- Internal Compiler Error when compiling glibc/stdio-common/vfprintf-internal.c. The build configuration is: BUILD: x86_64/linux

[Bug c++/95700] read-md.c: "missing sentinel in function call" when building gcc with musl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95700 --- Comment #20 from vvinayag at arm dot com --- (In reply to vvinayag from comment #18) > (In reply to Ilya Leoshkevich from comment #17) > > Created attachment 48917 [details] > > aarch64 native build fix > > > &g

[Bug c++/95700] read-md.c: "missing sentinel in function call" when building gcc with musl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95700 --- Comment #19 from vvinayag at arm dot com --- Created attachment 48921 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48921&action=edit Add -std=c++11 to the aarch64 native build fix This patch adds CXX="$CXX -std=c++11&q

[Bug c++/95700] read-md.c: "missing sentinel in function call" when building gcc with musl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95700 --- Comment #18 from vvinayag at arm dot com --- (In reply to Ilya Leoshkevich from comment #17) > Created attachment 48917 [details] > aarch64 native build fix > > Could you please try the attached patch? It fixed the issue

[Bug c++/95700] read-md.c: "missing sentinel in function call" when building gcc with musl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95700 --- Comment #15 from vvinayag at arm dot com --- (In reply to Ilya Leoshkevich from comment #14) > gcc113 has 4.8.4, which is a bit newer. But in any case, according to > https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html, gcc should support n

[Bug c++/95700] read-md.c: "missing sentinel in function call" when building gcc with musl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95700 --- Comment #13 from vvinayag at arm dot com --- (In reply to Ilya Leoshkevich from comment #12) > I managed to bootstrap and regtest upstream commit 6e41c27bf549 on gcc113 > farm machine. > > Two questions: > > - What is yo

[Bug c++/95700] read-md.c: "missing sentinel in function call" when building gcc with musl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95700 vvinayag at arm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vvinayag at arm dot com

[Bug libfortran/95920] New: Implicit declaration of function 'feenableexcept' in fpu-target.h

ty: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: vvinayag at arm dot com Target Milestone: --- I am seeing these implicit declaration errors when building gcc for arm-none-eabi targets. In file src/gcc/libgfortr

[Bug testsuite/94763] UNRESOLVED scan assembler tests on arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94763 vvinayag at arm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug testsuite/94763] UNRESOLVED scan assembler tests on arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94763 --- Comment #2 from vvinayag at arm dot com --- (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #1) > How do you configure GCC, and what flags to you use to run the tests? > They work for me, on several configuration of arm-non-eabi-gcc as &

[Bug testsuite/94763] New: UNRESOLVED scan assembler tests on arm-none-eabi

: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: vvinayag at arm dot com Target Milestone: --- Many tests are UNRESOLVED on arm-none-eabi. UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/abi/abi-tag1.C -std=gnu++14 scan-assembler _Z1fB3barB3fooi UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/abi/abi-tag1.C -std=gnu

[Bug fortran/92643] ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 failure on i586-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92643 vvinayag at arm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vvinayag at arm dot com