http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
--- Comment #16 from Vincent Gramoli
2011-01-24 12:04:37 UTC ---
Hi Aldy,
The bug does you refer to does not seem to be assigned to anyone.
Vincent
On Jan 20, 2011, at 3:31 PM, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
--- Comment #15 from Vincent Gramoli
2011-01-20 15:14:21 UTC ---
Thanks!
Vincent
On Jan 20, 2011, at 3:31 PM, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
>
> --- Comment #14 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
--- Comment #13 from Vincent Gramoli
2011-01-20 10:28:03 UTC ---
I updated and got the following problem while recompiling. Could it be related
to your recent changes somehow?
gcc -o gnupg/sha1.o -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
Vincent Gramoli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Version|unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46269
Summary: [trans-mem] internal compiler error in expand_block_tm
of trans-mem.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
Summary: [trans-mem] Error of unsafe function even if annotated
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assigne