--- Comment #10 from tfautre at pandora dot be 2010-06-02 16:54 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > I'm under the impression we should simply not provide operator __safe_bool()
>
> Agreed, there is no requirement for conversion to bool,
--- Additional Comments From tfautre at pandora dot be 2005-04-27 13:30
---
Thanks for the code, it's working.
The inline rdtsc code was from an IBM article; and after reading the GCC doc on
=A, I must admit I was expecting it to work on x86_64 too.
"ASpecifies the
--- Additional Comments From tfautre at pandora dot be 2005-04-27 13:08
---
Created an attachment (id=8754)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8754&action=view)
Small test program that exibits the problem.
The problem becomes more obvious when the program is c
0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: inline-asm
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tfautre at pandora dot be
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gn