[Bug libstdc++/40296] [C++0x] std::exception_ptr comparisons

2010-06-02 Thread tfautre at pandora dot be
--- Comment #10 from tfautre at pandora dot be 2010-06-02 16:54 --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #1) > > I'm under the impression we should simply not provide operator __safe_bool() > > Agreed, there is no requirement for conversion to bool,

[Bug inline-asm/21249] incorrect code generation for rdtsc on x86_64

2005-04-27 Thread tfautre at pandora dot be
--- Additional Comments From tfautre at pandora dot be 2005-04-27 13:30 --- Thanks for the code, it's working. The inline rdtsc code was from an IBM article; and after reading the GCC doc on =A, I must admit I was expecting it to work on x86_64 too. "ASpecifies the

[Bug inline-asm/21249] incorrect code generation for rdtsc on x86_64

2005-04-27 Thread tfautre at pandora dot be
--- Additional Comments From tfautre at pandora dot be 2005-04-27 13:08 --- Created an attachment (id=8754) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8754&action=view) Small test program that exibits the problem. The problem becomes more obvious when the program is c

[Bug inline-asm/21249] New: incorrect code generation for rdtsc on x86_64

2005-04-27 Thread tfautre at pandora dot be
0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: inline-asm AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tfautre at pandora dot be CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gn