https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106558
--- Comment #17 from Yuri Gribov ---
Fix has been approved
(https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606858.html), I hope
to merge it soon.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106558
--- Comment #13 from Yuri Gribov ---
Posted to gcc-patches:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/601041.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106558
--- Comment #11 from Yuri Gribov ---
Created attachment 53493
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53493&action=edit
Updated patch
Here is an updated patch which passes bootstrap-asan (I haven't run the
testsuite yet).
It resul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106558
--- Comment #8 from Yuri Gribov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
I've started work on this but I'll probly only have enough time to cook a patch
on weekend.
> Perhaps either a quick check that for base ptrs that live in memory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106558
Yuri Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tetra2005 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103276
Bug ID: 103276
Summary: [openacc] Trying to map already mapped data
Product: gcc
Version: og11 (devel/omp/gcc-11)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95550
--- Comment #2 from Yuri Gribov ---
The promised repro:
SUBROUTINE FOO()
INTEGER :: I
COMPLEX(8), ALLOCATABLE :: GWORK(:)
ALLOCATE(GWORK(512))
!$ACC PARALLEL LOOP PRIVA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93554
Yuri Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tetra2005 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95550
Yuri Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tetra2005 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102310
Yuri Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tetra2005 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
10 matches
Mail list logo