https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98459
Sylvestre Ledru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sylvestre at debian dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82711
Sylvestre Ledru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82734
--- Comment #3 from Sylvestre Ledru ---
For people who are getting these error, we fixed it with:
static_cast::type>(INT32_MAX)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82711
--- Comment #3 from Sylvestre Ledru ---
Jonathan, if I write a patch to implement the change, will you accept it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46989
Sylvestre Ledru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sylvestre at debian dot org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
sgunderson at bigfoot dot com, trippels at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83586
Sylvestre Ledru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8 regression] Invalid |[8 regression] Invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83586
--- Comment #2 from Sylvestre Ledru ---
Created attachment 43020
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43020&action=edit
preprocessed file
Here is the same issue on a smaller file.
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sylvestre at debian dot org
CC: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
/root/firefox-gcc-last/dom/gamepad/linux/LinuxGamepad.cpp: In member function
'void {anonymous}::LinuxGamepadSe
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sylvestre at debian dot org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Building Firefox with gcc 8 from Debian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82734
--- Comment #2 from Sylvestre Ledru ---
I could, the code would be just more complex for no gain.
Just like with bug 82711, gcc is way too careful here and the warning is just
adding noise.
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sylvestre at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 42490
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42490&action=edit
the ii file
With
---
#include
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sylvestre at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
With the following code:
#include
#include
void foo() {
const int BLOCK_SIZE = 42;
static_assert(
BLOCK_SIZE <
static_c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82561
Sylvestre Ledru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sylvestre at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
with:
void foo(void) {
const int ID = 1;
switch (0) {
case ID:
break;
}
}
# gcc-7 -Wall -c foo.cpp
# gcc-8 -Wall -c foo.cpp
foo.cpp
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sylvestre at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Compiling Firefox, we fixed several warnings found by -Wignored-qualifiers
I wonder if this option should not be moved under -Wextra.
The extra const isn't hurting and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82710
--- Comment #1 from Sylvestre Ledru ---
With gcc-8 (Debian 8-20171023-1) 8.0.0 20171023 (experimental) [trunk revision
253997]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82600
--- Comment #3 from Sylvestre Ledru ---
Created attachment 42389
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42389&action=edit
preprocessed file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82600
--- Comment #2 from Sylvestre Ledru ---
the command line:
/usr/bin/g++-8 -std=gnu++11 -o Unified_cpp_memory_build0.o -c
-I/root/firefox-gcc-last/obj-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/dist/system_wrappers -include
/root/firefox-gcc-last/config/gcc_hidden.h -DDE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82561
Sylvestre Ledru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82561
--- Comment #5 from Sylvestre Ledru ---
Created attachment 42377
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42377&action=edit
the .ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82561
--- Comment #4 from Sylvestre Ledru ---
Created attachment 42376
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42376&action=edit
the .s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82561
--- Comment #2 from Sylvestre Ledru ---
Created attachment 42375
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42375&action=edit
preprocessed file
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sylvestre at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Trying to build Firefox using g++8 (from Debian exp), version 8-20170923-1
/usr/bin/g++-8 -std=gnu++11 -c
-I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81993
--- Comment #13 from Sylvestre Ledru ---
Thanks, I appreciate the very quick reaction!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81993
--- Comment #7 from Sylvestre Ledru ---
Not my call but I am using it to build the llvm toolchain on i386.
Without gsplit-dwarf, I cannot link on the platform, it fails on:
/usr/bin/ld.gold: fatal error: ../../../../lib/liblldb-3.9.so.1: mmap: fa
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sylvestre at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Reported https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34140 & discussed
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-08/msg00287.html
Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80374
Sylvestre Ledru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sylvestre at debian dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79082
Sylvestre Ledru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sylvestre at debian dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67989
Sylvestre Ledru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sylvestre at debian dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55189
--- Comment #10 from Sylvestre Ledru ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #9)
>
> Cool! Hopefully it goes quickly. After that, I would suggest that you submit
> the patch to gcc-patches and CC Jason Merrill and Dodji Seketeli, either
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55189
--- Comment #8 from Sylvestre Ledru ---
The patches to fix this bug are available here:
https://github.com/sylvestre/gcc
I am doing the legal FSF papers to be able to apply it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55189
Sylvestre Ledru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sylvestre at debian dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52373
Bug #: 52373
Summary: template usage drops some checks on the accessibility
of a member
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52136
--- Comment #4 from Sylvestre Ledru 2012-02-06
14:08:21 UTC ---
I found this bug (or behavior) while playing with clang.
I am not really sure to understand why friend class should impact his parent
but if g++ respects the standard, why not...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52136
Bug #: 52136
Summary: g++ is wrongly propagating "friend class" to the
parent class
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
36 matches
Mail list logo
