https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116731
--- Comment #8 from Sunil Dora ---
Thank you so much Marek.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116731
--- Comment #5 from Sunil Dora ---
Dear GCC Team,
I am writing to request the backport of this fix (Wrange-loop-construct) to GCC
version 13.3. Due to particular project requirements, we are unable to upgrade
our GCC version at this time. This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116731
--- Comment #4 from Sunil Dora ---
Dear Community,
Are there any plans to backport to gcc 13.3 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527
--- Comment #21 from Sunil Dora ---
>From Andrew:
Sounds like the testcase needs to be changed. If you were not saving
around the file that was used for COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS in the previous
patches (with -save-temps), then that was broken.
Or i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527
--- Comment #20 from Sunil Dora ---
Hi Andrew,
Initially, I thought to address long command line options (when exceeding
128KB) without disrupting the existing GCC driver behavior.
As you suggested, I implemented changes to use the response f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116731
Bug ID: 116731
Summary: Incorrect behavior of -Wrange-loop-construct in GCC 14
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527
--- Comment #19 from Sunil Dora ---
Created attachment 59064
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59064&action=edit
Details of issue summary, response file logs and proposed solution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527
--- Comment #18 from Sunil Dora ---
Thank you, Sam.
I have addressed the feedback and submitted the revised V2 patch. You can
review it at the following link:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/661842.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527
Sunil Dora changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sunil.dora1988 at gmail dot com
--- Commen