[Bug gcov-profile/83214] [8 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C -std=gnu++11 gcov failed

2017-11-29 Thread sudi.das at arm dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83214 --- Comment #1 from Sudakshina Das --- Sorry I am bit confused with this. Not failing anymore on my bootstrapped build from trunk this morning!

[Bug gcov-profile/83214] New: [8 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C -std=gnu++11 gcov failed

2017-11-29 Thread sudi.das at arm dot com
Priority: P3 Component: gcov-profile Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sudi.das at arm dot com CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- On arm-none-linux-gnueabihf: FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C -std=gnu++11 gcov failed

[Bug tree-optimization/83195] [8 regression] pr82929.c scan for "Merging successful" fail

2017-11-28 Thread sudi.das at arm dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83195 --- Comment #4 from Sudakshina Das --- I think this is the only test that fails on arm.

[Bug regression/83195] New: [8 regression] pr82929.c scan for "Merging successful" fail

2017-11-28 Thread sudi.das at arm dot com
ty: normal Priority: P3 Component: regression Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sudi.das at arm dot com Target Milestone: --- The test case pr82929.c that got in recently with the store merging patches has started to fail on native arm-none-linux-gnueabihf

[Bug middle-end/83069] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in from_gcov_type, at profile-count.h:676

2017-11-27 Thread sudi.das at arm dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83069 Sudakshina Das changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sudi.das at arm dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug bootstrap/82948] [8 Regression] prefix.c:202:15: error: 'char* strncpy(char*, const char*, size_t)' destination unchanged after copying no bytes [-Werror=stringop-truncation]

2017-11-13 Thread sudi.das at arm dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82948 Sudakshina Das changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sudi.das at arm dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug ipa/82903] [8 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/20050826-2.c fail

2017-11-09 Thread sudi.das at arm dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82903 --- Comment #3 from Sudakshina Das --- Confirmed on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and arm-none-linux-gnueabihf

[Bug rtl-optimization/82454] Possible future performance regression in x86 for 64-bit constant expansions

2017-10-06 Thread sudi.das at arm dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82454 --- Comment #1 from Sudakshina Das --- Created attachment 42318 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42318&action=edit test2

[Bug rtl-optimization/82454] New: Possible future performance regression in x86 for 64-bit constant expansions

2017-10-06 Thread sudi.das at arm dot com
: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sudi.das at arm dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 42317 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42317&action=edit test1 As

[Bug target/82440] [8 regression] ICE in aarch64_simd_valid_immediate

2017-10-06 Thread sudi.das at arm dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82440 --- Comment #3 from Sudakshina Das --- Again my apologies for this. Please refer to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg00329.html

[Bug target/82440] [8 regression] ICE in aarch64_simd_valid_immediate

2017-10-05 Thread sudi.das at arm dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82440 --- Comment #2 from Sudakshina Das --- Sorry about this. I am currently testing a fix for this. Sudakshina

[Bug tree-optimization/80249] New: Failed to build SPEC 2006 483.xalancbmk with -fdump-tree-fre

2017-03-29 Thread sudi.das at arm dot com
Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sudi.das at arm dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 41071 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41071&action=edit Reduced testcase An ICE